The End of Anonymous Sperm Donation in Colorado: A Step Forward to a New Fertility Future in the US?

This Viewpoint discusses the new Colorado law prohibiting anonymous gamete donation and other debates over reproductive technologies and secrecy.

Donor IUI is equally effective for heterosexual couples, single women and lesbians, but autologous IUI does worse.

STUDY QUESTION: Are there differences in the clinical outcomes of IUI among different populational groups (heterosexual couples, single women and lesbian couples)? SUMMARY ANSWER: The outcome of donor IUI (D-IUI) is similar in all populational groups and better than that seen with autologous insemination. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A vast body of literature on clinical outcome is available for counselling heterosexual couples regarding decisions related to ART. The reproductive potential of single women, lesbian couples and heterosexual couples who need donor semen is assumed to be better, but there is a scarcity of data on their ART performance to actually confirm it. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this retrospective multicentric cohort study, a total of 7228 IUI treatment cycles performed in 3807 patients between January 2013 and December 2016 in 13 private clinics belonging to the same reproductive medicine group in Spain were included. Patients with previous IUI attempts were excluded from the study. Only 1.9% of cycles were lost to follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 5318 D-IUI cycles were performed in three different populational groups: heterosexual couples (D-HC, 1167 cycles), single women (SW, 2839 cycles) and lesbian couples (LC, 1312), while a total of 1910 autologous IUI cycles were performed in heterosexual couples (A-HC). This last one was considered the control group and was composed of cycles performed in couples with a male partner with sperm parameters equivalent to those requested from donors. In order to identify factors with an impact on clinical outcome, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Regarding live birth rate (LBR), mixed effect models were employed to control for the fact that different patients were submitted to different numbers of treatments. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Parameters that were significant to the primary outcome (LBR) according to the multivariate analysis were the populational group (D-HC, SW, LC and A-HC) to which the patient belonged, female age and a diagnosis of low ovarian reserve. At the age range of good prognosis (≤37 years), LBR was similar in all groups that underwent D-IUI (18.8% for D-HC, 16.5% for SW and 17.6% for LC) but was significantly lower in the autologous IUI (A-HC) group (11%). For all these significant findings, the strength of the association was confirmed by P values <0.001. From 38 years of age on, no significant differences were observed among the populational groups studied, and for all of them, LBR was below 7% from 40 years of age on. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: To the best of our knowledge, a smoking habit was the only known factor with a potential effect on ART outcome that could not be controlled for, due to the unavailability of this information in a significant percentage of the clinical files studied. Our study was not capable of precisely quantifying the impact of a diagnosis of low ovarian reserve on the LBR of both IUI and D-IUI, due to the number of cycles performed in patients with such diagnosis (n = 231, 3.2% of the total). WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: For the first time, a comparison among D-HC, SW, LC and A-HC was performed in a study with a robust sample size and controlling for potential sources of bias. There is now sound evidence that equivalent clinical outcome is seen in the three groups treated with donor semen (D-HC, SW and LC). Specifically, regarding the comparison between SW and LC, our findings rule out differences in LBR proposed by previous publications, with very similar clinical outcomes within the same age ranges. At age ranges of good prognosis (≤37 years), reproductive performance of D-IUI is significantly better than that seen in heterosexual couples undergoing autologous IUI, even when only cases of optimal sperm quality are considered in this last group. This finding is in agreement with the concept that, as a group, A-HC are more prone to have female factor infertility, even when their infertility assessment finds no contraindication to IUI. Age affects all these groups equally, with none of them reaching a 7% LBR after the age of 40 years. Our findings will be useful for the counselling of patients from the different populations studied here about ART strategies. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None.

Ciclos de inseminación artificial con semen de donante / Artificial insemination cycles with donor sperm

No disponible

Intrauterine insemination versus intracervical insemination in donor sperm treatment.

BACKGROUND: The first-line treatment in donor sperm treatment consists of inseminations that can be done by intrauterine insemination (IUI) or by intracervical insemination (ICI). OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and safety of intrauterine insemination (IUI) and intracervical insemination (ICI) in women who start donor sperm treatment. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL in October 2016, checked references of relevant studies, and contacted study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, the Grey literature, and five trials registers on 15 December 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on IUI versus ICI in natural cycles or with ovarian stimulation, and RCTs comparing different cointerventions in IUI and ICI. We included cross-over studies if pre-cross-over data were available. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. We collected data on primary outcomes of live birth and multiple pregnancy rates, and on secondary outcomes of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and cancellation rates. MAIN RESULTS: We included six RCTs (708 women analysed) on ICI and IUI in donor sperm treatment. Two studies compared IUI and ICI in natural cycles, two studies compared IUI and ICI in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles, and two studies compared timing of IUI and ICI. There was very low-quality evidence; the main limitations were risk of bias due to poor reporting of study methods, and serious imprecision.IUI versus ICI in natural cyclesThere was insufficient evidence to determine whether there was any clear difference in live birth rate between IUI and ICI in natural cycles (odds ratio (OR) 3.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12 to 87.13; 1 RCT, 26 women; very low-quality evidence). There was only one live birth in this study (in the IUI group). IUI resulted in higher clinical pregnancy rates (OR 6.18, 95% CI 1.91 to 20.03; 2 RCTs, 76 women; I² = 48%; very low-quality evidence).No multiple pregnancies or miscarriages occurred in this study.IUI versus ICI in gonadotrophin-stimulated cyclesThere was insufficient evidence to determine whether there was any clear difference in live birth rate between IUI and ICI in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles (OR 2.55, 95% CI 0.72 to 8.96; 1 RCT, 43 women; very low-quality evidence). This suggested that if the chance of a live birth following ICI in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles was assumed to be 30%, the chance following IUI in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles would be between 24% and 80%. IUI may result in higher clinical pregnancy rates than ICI (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.38 to 5.78; 2 RCTs, 131 women; I² = 0%; very low-quality evidence). IUI may be associated with higher multiple pregnancy rates than ICI (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.00 to 7.69; 2 RCTs, 131 women; I² = 0%; very low-quality evidence). This suggested that if the risk of multiple pregnancy following ICI in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles was assumed to be 10%, the risk following IUI would be between 10% and 46%.We found insufficient evidence to determine whether there was any clear difference between the groups in miscarriage rates in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles (OR 1.97, 95% CI 0.43 to 9.04; 2 RCTs, overall 67 pregnancies; I² = 50%; very low-quality evidence).Timing of IUI and ICIWe found no studies that reported on live birth rates.We found a higher clinical pregnancy rate when IUI was timed one day after a rise in blood levels of luteinising hormone (LH) compared to IUI two days after a rise in blood levels of LH (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.53; 1 RCT, 351 women; low-quality evidence). We found insufficient evidence to determine whether there was any clear difference in clinical pregnancy rates between ICI timed after a rise in urinary levels of LH versus a rise in basal temperature plus cervical mucus scores (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.42 to 4.11; 1 RCT, 56 women; very low-quality evidence).Neither of these studies reported multiple pregnancy or miscarriage rates as outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence to determine whether there was a clear difference in live birth rates between IUI and ICI in natural or gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles in women who started with donor sperm treatment. There was insufficient evidence available for the effect of timing of IUI or ICI on live birth rates. Very low-quality data suggested that in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles, ICI may be associated with a higher clinical pregnancy rate than IUI, but also with a higher risk of multiple pregnancy rate. We concluded that the current evidence was too limited to choose between IUI or ICI, in natural cycles or with ovarian stimulation, in donor sperm treatment.

Clomiphene Citrate versus Letrozole for Ovarian Stimulation in Therapeutic Donor Sperm Insemination.

AIM: To compare clomiphene citrate (CC) and letrozole for ovarian stimulation (OS) in therapeutic donor sperm insemination (TDI) cycles. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study between January 2011 and June 2014 at a University-affiliated private IVF clinic in Montreal, Canada. 257 normo-ovulatory women ≤40 years of age with no history of infertility undergoing 590 TDI cycles in the absence of a male partner (single women and same-sex couples) or azoospermia were included. Patients received 100 mg CC daily (145 women, 321 cycles) or letrozole 5 mg daily (112 women, 269 cycles), from days 3 to 7. Only the first 3 cycles were included per patient. Our main outcome measure was cumulative live birth rates (LBR). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. There were no differences in LBR per cycle (16.5% (53/321) vs. 11.5% (31/269), p = 0.08) and cumulative LBR (36.6% (53/145) vs. 27.7% (31/112), p = 0.13), between CC and letrozole, respectively. Multiple pregnancy rate (11.6% (8/69) vs. 8.7% (4/46), p = 0.6) and miscarriage rate (21.7 vs. 21.7%, p = 1) were also comparable between CC and letrozole, respectively. CONCLUSION: In normo-ovulatory women undergoing TDI, OS with CC or letrozole resulted in similar live birth and twin pregnancy rates.

[Influence of artificial insemination with donor sperm on the pregnancy outcomes and safety of the offspring].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors influencing the pregnancy outcomes of artificial insemination with donor sperm (AID), improve the pregnancy rate, and evaluate the safety of the offspring. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 7,761 cycles of AID for 5,109 infertile couples performed between July 1, 2005 and June 30, 2013 in the Center of Reproductive Medicine of Shenyang No 204 Hospital, the outcomes of pregnancy, and the incidence of birth defects. RESULTS: Totally, 2 252 clinical pregnancies were achieved by AID, in which the pregnancy rate per cycle was 29. 02% and the cumulative pregnancy rate was 44. 08%. The clinical pregnancy rate was remarkably higher in the females of ≤ 35 years than in those of > 35 years old (30.31% vs 20.18%, P < 0.01), in the women with < 5-year infertility than in those with > 5-year infertility (30.83% vs 28.16%, P < 0.01), and in the patients of the ovarian stimulation group than in those of the natural cycle group (33.22% vs 28.68%, P < 0.01) The clinical pregnancy rate was the highest in the first treatment cycle (29.87%), with statistically significant difference from the fourth cycle (23.61%) (P < 0.05), but not between the other cycles (P > 0.05). There were 28 cases of birth defects in the offspring (1.40%), including 6 cases (21.43%) involving the cardiovascular system, 4 (14.29%) involving the musculoskeletal system, 3 (10.71%) involving the urogenital system, 3 (10.71%) involving the central nervous system, 2 cases (7.14%) of cleft lip and palate, 2 (7.14%) involving the respiratory system, 2 (7.14%) involving the gastrointestinal digestive system, and other anomalies. CONCLUSION: Female age, infertility duration, and ovarian stimulation treatment are important factors influencing the clinical pregnancy rate of AID. Artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm does not increase the incidence of birth defects, which is considered as a relatively safe technique of assisted reproduction.

Standards in reporting cryopreserved donor sperm characteristics: should they be reported post-thaw or post-wash?

An increase in the reliance on imported donor samples has been the consequence of a continued shortage of UK donors. Disputes can arise between suppliers and purchasers if the sperm quality is not as expected, yet there appears to be no requirement for the standardization of methods for sperm processing or analysis. Following analysis of 102 donor intrauterine insemination cycles, this study demonstrates that the motile sperm concentration is significantly (P < 0.05) reduced after the necessary removal of cryoprotectant before insemination. Suppliers of donor spermatozoa should therefore provide information on standards used for sperm assessment and whether analysis is performed before or after washing in order that purchasers are better informed about the quality of the end product they are committed to buying.

Relationship between donor sperm parameters and pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination: analysis of 2821 cycles in 1355 couples.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether sperm parameters can affect the pregnancy outcome of artificial intrauterine insemination with cryopreserved donor spermatozoon (AID). A total of 1355 couples received 2821 AID treatment cycles in the Reproductive Medicine Center of the Tongji Medical College between January 2010 and December 2013, and the data were collected and retrospectively analysed. The relationship between pre-freezing, post-thawing as well as optimised sperm parameters and AID pregnancy outcome was investigated. Clinical pregnancy rate and cumulated pregnancy rate were also calculated. A total of 728 cycles from 2821 treatment cycles achieved pregnancies, and cumulated pregnancy rate was 25.81%. Pre-freezing progressive sperm motility in pregnant cycles was higher than that in nonpregnant cycles (P = 0.001); logistic regression analysis also indicated that pre-freezing progressive sperm motility was the only parameter affecting pregnancy outcome (P = 0.0001). Our study also showed that the cumulated pregnancy rate increased progressively and reached a plateau after the fifth cycle. In conclusion, pre-freezing progressive sperm motility should be a valuable predictor for AID pregnancy outcome. Female fertility factors should be considered, or IVF/ICSI should be recommended when couples received more than 5 AID cycles without pregnancy.

Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: Does intrauterine insemination in the natural cycle lead to better pregnancy rates than intracervical insemination (ICI) in the natural cycle in women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. SUMMARY ANSWER: In a large cohort of women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm, there was no substantial beneficial effect of IUI in the natural cycle over ICI in the natural cycle. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: At present, there are no studies comparing IUI in the natural cycle versus ICI in the natural cycle in women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed a retrospective cohort study among all eight sperm banks in the Netherlands. We included all women who underwent artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle between January 2009 and December 2010. We compared time to ongoing pregnancy in the first six cycles of IUI and ICI, after which controlled ovarian stimulation was commenced. Ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) over time were compared using life tables. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to compare the chances of reaching an ongoing pregnancy after IUI or ICI adjusted for female age and indication. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We included 1843 women; 1163 women underwent 4269 cycles of IUI and 680 women underwent 2345 cycles of ICI with cryopreserved donor sperm. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Baseline characteristics were equally distributed (mean age 34.0 years for the IUI group versus 33.8 years for the ICI group), while in the IUI group, there were more lesbian women than in the ICI group (40.6% for IUI compared with 31.8% for ICI). Cumulative OPRs up to six treatment cycles were 40.5% for IUI and 37.9% for ICI. This corresponds with a hazard rate ratio of 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.23] after controlling for female age and indication. Increasing female age was associated with a lower OPR, in both the IUI and ICI groups with a hazard ratio for ongoing pregnancy of 0.94 per year (95% CI 0.93-0.97). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is prone to selection bias due to its retrospective nature. As potential confounders such as parity and duration of subfertility were not registered, the effect of these potential confounders could not be evaluated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In women inseminated with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle, we found no substantial benefit of IUI over ICI. A randomized controlled trial with economic analysis alongside, it is needed to allow a more definitive conclusion on the cost-effectiveness of insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No funding was used and no conflicts of interest are declared.

Single-donor and double-donor sperm intrauterine insemination cycles: does double intrauterine insemination increase clinical pregnancy rates?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pregnancy outcomes in the setting of a single- vs. double-donor sperm intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment cycle. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Large, private assisted reproductive technology practice. PATIENT(S): Donor sperm IUI recipients. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy. RESULT(S): There were 2,486 double and 673 single-donor sperm IUI cycles. The two groups were similar for age, body mass index, and the number of prior cycles. The clinical pregnancy rates were similar between the two groups (single: 16.4% vs. double: 13.6%). In univariate regression analysis, age, total motile sperm, and diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) were associated with pregnancy. Generalized estimating equation models accounting for repeated measures, age, DOR and total motile sperm and the interactions of these factors demonstrated that single and double IUI had similar odds of pregnancy (odds ratio 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.44). Pregnancy rates remained similar between the two groups in matched comparison and other subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION(S): Single and double-donor IUI cycles had similar clinical pregnancy rates. This large data set did not demonstrate a benefit to routine double IUI in donor sperm cycles.

Cumulative delivery rates after ICSI with donor spermatozoa in different age groups.

This retrospective cohort study followed a total of 364 women from their first fresh, donor intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle through to up to six ICSI cycles. All patients started their treatment between January 2003 and December 2007. Live delivery after 25 weeks of gestation was the main outcome measure. The overall crude cumulative delivery rate (CDR) after six cycles was 66% while the overall expected CDR was 90%. In women aged 38-39 years, the crude and expected CDR after six cycles were 54% and 82%, respectively. In women aged 30-37 years, the crude and expected CDR after six cycles were 66% and 91%, respectively. In women aged 20-29 years the crude and expected CDR after six cycles were 81% and 93%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the CDR of patients who had a primary ICSI treatment (no previous intrauterine insemination) and patients who had previous intrauterine insemination. This study corroborates the impact of age on ICSI with donor spermatozoa.

Should an intrauterine insemination with donor semen be performed 1 or 2 days after the spontaneous LH rise? A prospective RCT.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the impact on pregnancy rates when intrauterine insemination (IUI) is performed 1 or 2 days after the spontaneous LH rise? SUMMARY ANSWER: IUI 1 day after the spontaneous LH rise results in significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates compared with IUI performed 2 days after the LH rise. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: IUI is scheduled within a limited time interval during which successful conception can be expected. Data about the optimal timing of IUI are based on inseminations following ovarian stimulation. There is no available evidence regarding the correct timing of IUI in a natural menstrual cycle following the occurrence of a spontaneous LH rise. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective RCT, including patients undergoing IUI with donor sperm in a natural menstrual cycle. IUI cycles (n = 435) were randomized between October 2010 and April 2013, of which 23 were excluded owing to protocol deviation and 412 received the allocated intervention. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Serial serum LH concentrations were analysed in samples taken between 07:00 and 09:00 h to detect an LH rise from Day 11 of the cycle onwards. The subjects were randomized to receive insemination either 1 or 2 days after the observed LH rise. In the final analysis, there were 213 cycles in the group receiving IUI 1 day after the LH rise and 199 cycles in the group receiving IUI 2 days after the LH rise. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates per IUI cycle were observed in patients undergoing IUI 1 day after the LH rise when compared with patients undergoing IUI 2 days after the LH rise [19.7 (42/213) versus 11.1% (22/199), P = 0.02]. In view of the timing of sampling for LH, the inseminations were performed at 27 h (±2 h) and 51 h (±2 h) after detection of the LH rise. The risk ratio of achieving a clinical pregnancy if IUI was scheduled 1 day after the LH rise compared with 2 days was 1.78 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11-2.88]. This points towards a gain of one additional clinical pregnancy for every 12 cycles performed 1 day instead of 2 days after the LH rise. When analysing the results per patient, including only women who underwent their first treatment cycle of insemination, the outcome was in line with the per cycle analysis, demonstrating an 8% difference in pregnancy rate in favour of the early group (20.5 versus 12.2%), however, this difference was not significant. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Optimal monitoring for the occurrence of the LH rise involves several daily LH measurements, which is not always amenable to everyday clinical practice, however, daily sampling was sufficient to detect a significant difference in pregnancy rate. The strict inclusion of a highly selected population of patients who underwent IUI in a natural cycle may have been a limitation. IUI in a natural menstrual cycle confers lower success rates compared with IUI following ovarian stimulation and is not suitable for patients with ovulatory dysfunction. Furthermore, a similar study in a larger number of women is required to confirm the result in terms of pregnancy rate per patient. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first RCT to show that timing of IUI in a natural menstrual cycle is important and that IUI should be performed 1 day after the LH rise, rather than 2 days post-LH rise. Daily monitoring of the rise in LH, as performed in our study, can be adopted to achieve a higher pregnancy rate per IUI cycle. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was received for this study. All authors declare to have no conflict of interest with regard to this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01622023).

[Prognosis factors in donor semen insemination: a 10-years follow-up study of 188 patients]. / Facteurs pronostiques en insémination avec sperme de donneur : suivi rétrospectif d'une cohorte de 188 patientes.

OBJECTIVES: Improving our practice by a constant evaluation is essential in the field of donor semen insemination (DI). Our center examined the prognosis factors for DI success in order to standardize patient treatment options. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all couples referred for DI from January 2000 till December 2010. RESULTS: We analysed 551 cycles among 188 patients. Pregnancy rate by stimulation cycle was 19,8% with birth rate of 16.7%. The rate of pregnancy was improved till the fourth trial then plateau. On a patient-based analysis, success factors were age (P=0.04), previous successful DSI (P=0.02), and no previous failure of an ICSI-C (P=0.035). On a cycle-based analysis, success factors were the number of follicles greater than 15mm (P=0.04) and than 18mm (P=0.001). The percentage of 68.1 patients obtained a child by IVF-D after a failed DI. CONCLUSION: There are two predictive factors for DI success: the age of the patient and the number of mature follicles. It seems accurate to referred patients to IVF-D after four unsuccessful cycles of DSI. This recommendation may be adapted according to patient's age and hormonal evaluation.

Donor sperm insemination cycles: are two inseminations better than one?

The objective of this study was to determine the clinical pregnancy rate with 2 inseminations compared to a single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in a given cycle using frozen-thawed donor sperm. This was a retrospective study at a university practice; patients were women using donor sperm. We conducted a comparison of single IUI, intracervical insemination (ICI) followed by an IUI on the next day, and double IUI (2 consecutive days); clinical pregnancy rate was the main outcome measure. The cycle-specific and total pregnancy rates were not significantly different between the 3 protocol groups (306 cycles). The average pregnancy rate over 3 cycles was 10.2% for IUI, 15.3% for ICI/IUI, and 13.7% for IUI/IUI (P = .47). After controlling for repeated measures per subject and age, gravidity, and use of Clomid, there was no significant difference between protocols. The ICI/IUI (odds ratio [OR] = 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-3.51) and IUI/IUI (OR = 1.5; 95% CI, 0.52-4.33) protocols appeared more likely to result in a clinical pregnancy than the single IUI protocol. Current information on the optimal number of inseminations per cycle using donor sperm is limited. Our large study using 3 protocols found an increase in pregnancy rate with the addition of either an ICI or IUI to a single IUI protocol in a natural or Clomid cycle but did not meet statistical significance. Additional prospective studies are needed to better counsel patients using donor sperm.

Choreographies of sperm donations: dilemmas of intimacy in lesbian couple donor conception.

Assisted conception involving donor insemination challenges cultural idioms of parenthood and family; there is now a growing body of work exploring how women and couples negotiate becoming a family in this way. But sperm donation also raises questions on the more intimate levels of sex, sexuality and sexual bodies, and these have received little sustained attention in the literature. Lesbian couples in the U.K. increasingly negotiate access to medicalised donor insemination, but many also conceive in informal arrangements with donors where they themselves negotiate proximity and contact with donors when retrieving donor sperm. I explore in this paper how lesbian couples manage and perceive sperm donations, how they seek to negotiate their intimate, sexual and bodily overtones, and how the medical and non-medical settings enable them to do this in different ways. I draw on empirical data from an interview study conducted from 2006 to 2009 in England and Wales comprising 25 lesbian couples. I suggest that sperm donation raises dilemmas of intimacy for lesbian couples, and that couples try to resolve such dilemmas by carefully and intentionally choreographing donation events through managing patterns of movement and action. The different institutional, medical and regulatory frameworks governing clinical and non-clinical sperm donation shape that management in significant and different ways. I argue that sperm donation choreographies enable couples to negotiate the private, sexual and intimate tensions surrounding sperm donations, and also the subjectivity of the sperm donor.

Mating by proxy: a novel perspective to donor conception.

How single, partnered lesbian, and partnered heterosexual women undertaking donor insemination rate the importance of donor characteristics is explored in the context of Trivers's parental investment theory. Consistent with this theory, single women placed higher value on biographical traits reflective of the donor's level of potential resources (occupation, hobbies, age) and good character compared with either partnered lesbian or heterosexual women.

Factors associated with parents' decisions to tell their adult offspring about the offspring's donor conception.

BACKGROUND: Tensions and anxieties surround secrecy within families in the context of gamete donation and family building. This paper presents the views of parents who had kept their use of donor insemination a secret from their offspring. A sub-set of these parents said that they wished to tell their now-adult offspring, and discussed the questions and issues this secrecy raised to them. METHODS: In-depth interviews were undertaken with heterosexual parents (of 44 families) who had given birth to children conceived via donor insemination between 1983 and 1987. These interviews comprised a follow-up study, with the first interviews being undertaken when the children were aged up to seven. In this paper, qualitative data relating to a sub-set of 12 parents (from seven families) who now wished to tell their offspring are presented. RESULTS: The parents describe the pressures that the secret-keeping had created for them as well as the impact of those pressures. They report on the reasons they now want to share the family building history and the associated fears and anxieties about doing so. The parents all say that they wish they had told their offspring much earlier. In five of the seven families, parents describe how the offspring had raised questions concerning a perceived genetic disconnection between them and their parents. CONCLUSIONS: Keeping the use of donor insemination a secret from offspring created considerable pressure for these parents. Despite the secrecy, offspring can become aware of the genetic disconnection.

Factors affecting fecundity among sperm donors: a multivariate analysis.

UNLABELLED: The study was aimed at identifying the predictors of the male fertility potential among sperm donors. Fifty anonymous donors undergoing 683 intracervical insemination (ICI) cycles between January 2002 and December 2006 were retrospectively evaluated according to semen characteristics in terms of reproduction rate (RR). We used RR as a parameter to determine the fertility potential among sperm donors. The overall RR was 26.79%. There were no significant differences among low, mean and high RR groups with regard to most sperm routine parameters. However, the RR was notably higher in the sperm morphology of ≥18% than in the <18% group (26.2% versus 19.4% respectively; P < 0.01). Both post-thaw total motility and progressive motility were proportional to RR (P < 0.01). Differences in RR were seen when the percentage of propidium iodide-negative spermatozoa was ≥45% (26.2% versus 16.4% respectively; P < 0.01) and DNA fragmentation index (DFI) was <8% (37.5% versus 17.9% respectively; P < 0.01) in post-thaw samples. Using stepwise linear regression analysis, the percentage of normal morphology, post-thaw progressive motility, PI-negative spermatozoa, DFI had the maximum power to predict the donor fecundity in ICIs. CONCLUSION: Both the integrity of plasma membrane and DNA in spermatozoa are crucial factors affecting the fecundity of sperm donors. Therefore, the addition of some of these new tests to routine semen analysis could significantly improve the recruitment of sperm donors and the clinical pregnancy rate of anonymous donors.

Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) parameters and their evolution during preparation as predictors of pregnancy in intrauterine insemination with frozen-thawed donor semen cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To study the potential of CASA parameters in frozen-thawed donor semen before and after preparation on silica gradient as predictors of pregnancy in IUI with donor semen cycles. STUDY DESIGN: CASA parameters were measured in thawed donor semen before and after preparation on a silica gradient in 132 couples undergoing 168 IUI cycles with donor semen. The evolution of these parameters throughout this process was calculated. The relationship with cycle outcome was then studied. RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy rate was 18.4% per cycle. CASA parameters on donor semen before or after preparation were not significantly different between pregnancy and failure groups. However, amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH) of spermatozoa improved in all cycles where pregnancy occurred, thus predicting pregnancy with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Even if CASA parameters do not seem to predict pregnancy in IUI with donor semen cycles, their evolution during the preparation process should be evaluated, especially for ALH. However, the link between ALH improvement during preparation process and pregnancy remains to be explored.

[Sperm or oocyte donation: the dynamics of making the decision regarding the method and timing of disclosure of information to the sibling].

A dramatic increase in the number of children born as a result of gamete donation has occurred worldwide over the past decade. Concurrent to the acceleration in the use of gamete donation there has been a growing movement advocating non-anonymity in donor programs and disclosure to the offspring of donor gamete conceptions. The fact that current recommendations concerning gamete donation differ widely among various countries reflects the Lack of consensus around the world, especially in regard to two major issues: donor anonymity and the disclosure decision. In the past, the donors' identity was always kept anonymous, and they were ensured full secrecy. Recently, a 'double track' policy has become increasingly popular. Under this policy, the donor has the choice to enter the program as either an anonymous or an identifiable donor, while the recipient can choose between these two types of donors. This scheme allows the recipients to decide in the future the degree of disclosure that best meets their interest in involving the donor in their lives. The parent's decision regarding disclosure of gamete donation before the child reflects their general philosophy and their individual values regarding the way they manage their Lives, and specifically how they desire to fulfill their role as parents. Study resuLts show that individual counseling appeared to be helpfuL and appreciated by study participants. This is particuLarLy true when delivered without judgment or directive personal opinion. Peer support, often in the form of professionally-led groups, was most highly valued. It seems likely that peer support, not only reduces the sense of isolation and stigma by normalizing the donor experience, but facilitates information acquisition derived from the shared, personal, lived experiences of other parents in the same unique life situation.